Task: [Your task description]

Step 1: Generate an initial response

Step 2: Critique your response
Evaluate based on:
- [Criterion 1]
- [Criterion 2]
- [Criterion 3]

Identify specific weaknesses and areas for improvement.

Step 3: Create an improved version based on your critique

Present:
1. Initial Response
2. Critique
3. Refined Response

Task: Write a marketing email for our new project management software targeting small business owners.

Step 1: Generate an initial marketing email

Step 2: Critique your email
Evaluate based on:
- Subject line effectiveness (will they open it?)
- Clarity of value proposition
- Call-to-action strength
- Tone (professional but friendly)
- Length (concise vs. comprehensive)

Identify specific weaknesses.

Step 3: Create an improved version based on your critique

Present:
1. Initial Email
2. Critique
3. Refined Email

Subject: Check Out Our New Project Management Tool

Hi,

We're excited to introduce our new project management software. It has great features that will help your business stay organized and productive.

Some key features include:
- Task management
- Team collaboration
- Reporting and analytics

Try it free for 30 days!

[Sign Up Now]

Best regards,
The Team

Weaknesses identified:
- Subject line is generic and doesn't create urgency or curiosity
- Opening lacks personalization and specific pain points
- Features listed without explaining benefits or outcomes
- No social proof or credibility indicators
- Call-to-action lacks specificity about what happens after signup
- "The Team" is impersonal
- Doesn't address why small business owners specifically need this

Subject: Rescue 10+ hours/week from project chaos ⏰

Hi [First Name],

Do you spend more time managing projects than actually doing them?

As a small business owner, every hour counts. Yet the average SMB owner wastes 12 hours/week on:
❌ Chasing project updates
❌ Searching for files and conversations
❌ Manually tracking what's done and what's not

ProjectFlow changes that.

Our customers report saving 10+ hours weekly by centralizing:
✅ All tasks, deadlines, and assignments in one visual board
✅ Team conversations directly on relevant projects (no more email hunting)
✅ Automatic progress reports that show exactly where things stand

"ProjectFlow cut our project management time in half. Now I actually have time to grow the business." 
— Sarah Chen, CEO, GrowthPath Marketing

Try ProjectFlow free for 30 days—no credit card required. Takes 5 minutes to set up.

[Start Your Free Trial →]

P.S. Need help getting started? Book a free 15-minute setup call with our team.

Best,
Michael
Customer Success Team
ProjectFlow

Task: [Your task]

Round 1:
- Generate initial response
- Critique it based on [criteria]
- Create improved version

Round 2:
- Critique the improved version
- Identify remaining weaknesses
- Create further improved version

Round 3:
- Final critique
- Polish and perfect
- Deliver final version

Present all versions and critiques to show the evolution.

Task: Write a blog post about [topic]

Step 1: Write the initial blog post

Step 2: Critique from multiple perspectives:
A) As an SEO expert: Evaluate keyword usage, structure, meta description
B) As a writing coach: Evaluate clarity, flow, engagement
C) As your target reader: Evaluate relevance, value, actionability

Step 3: Create refined version addressing all critiques

Present:
1. Initial post
2. Three perspectives of critique
3. Refined post

Task: Write a blog post about improving workplace productivity

Step 1: Write initial post

Step 2: Critique from three perspectives:
A) As an SEO expert: Evaluate search optimization
B) As a productivity coach: Evaluate practical value
C) As a busy professional: Evaluate reading experience and implementation ease

Step 3: Refine based on all three critiques

Task: Write a landing page headline for [product]

Step 1: Generate 3 initial headline options

Step 2: For each headline, evaluate how it compares to these competitor headlines:
- [Competitor 1 headline]
- [Competitor 2 headline]
- [Competitor 3 headline]

Identify what makes competitors' headlines effective and how yours can be better.

Step 3: Create improved headlines that outperform the competition

Present:
1. Initial headlines
2. Competitive analysis
3. Improved headlines with explanation of advantages

Task: Write a Twitter thread about [topic]

Step 1: Generate initial thread

Step 2: Score your thread on these metrics (1-10):
- Hook strength (will people read beyond tweet 1?)
- Value density (useful info per tweet)
- Engagement potential (likely to get likes/replies)
- Clarity (easy to understand)
- Call-to-action effectiveness

For each score below 8, explain why and what to improve.

Step 3: Rewrite thread with improvements, aiming for 9-10 on all metrics

Present:
1. Initial thread
2. Scores and explanations
3. Improved thread with new scores

Task: Write a Python function to validate email addresses

Step 1: Write the initial function

Step 2: Review your code for:
- Correctness (does it handle edge cases?)
- Performance (any inefficiencies?)
- Readability (clear variable names, comments?)
- Error handling (what if invalid input?)
- Security (any vulnerabilities?)

Step 3: Write improved version addressing all issues

Step 4: Add comprehensive unit tests

Present all versions with explanations of improvements.

Task: Improve this resume bullet point:
"Managed marketing campaigns and improved results"

Step 1: Rewrite with more specifics

Step 2: Critique based on:
- Specificity (concrete numbers and details?)
- Action verb strength
- Result clarity (what was the impact?)
- Relevance for [target role]

Step 3: Create strongest possible version

Step 4: Provide 2 alternative versions for different emphasis

Present:
1. Original
2. First attempt
3. Critique
4. Strongest version
5. Two alternatives

Task: Transform this long-form article into a LinkedIn post

[Paste article]

Step 1: Create initial LinkedIn post

Step 2: Critique based on:
- Hook (grabs attention in first 2 lines?)
- Length (ideal LinkedIn length: 150-300 words)
- Format (scannable with line breaks, emojis?)
- Value (key insight clearly communicated?)
- Engagement prompt (ends with question or CTA?)

Step 3: Create improved version

Step 4: Suggest 3 accompanying image ideas

Present all versions and suggestions.

Task: Create agenda for weekly team meeting

Context: 10-person marketing team, 60-minute meeting

Step 1: Draft initial agenda

Step 2: Evaluate against best practices:
- Time allocation (realistic for each item?)
- Priority ordering (most important first?)
- Clarity (attendees know what to prepare?)
- Action-oriented (clear outcomes expected?)
- Participation (everyone has a voice?)

Step 3: Create optimized agenda

Step 4: Suggest pre-meeting preparation checklist

Present:
1. Initial agenda
2. Critique
3. Optimized agenda
4. Prep checklist

Task: Write an introduction for a research paper on [topic]

Step 1: Write initial introduction

Step 2: Evaluate against academic writing standards:
- Clear thesis statement?
- Proper literature context?
- Research gap identified?
- Methodology preview?
- Logical flow?
- Academic tone (not too casual)?
- Citation placeholders where needed?

Rate each criterion: Strong / Adequate / Weak

Step 3: Rewrite strengthening all "Adequate" and "Weak" areas

Step 4: Final polish for academic style

Present:
1. Initial introduction
2. Detailed evaluation
3. Improved introduction
4. Final polished version

Task: Simplify this contract clause for client understanding:
[Paste complex legal text]

Step 1: Create simplified version

Step 2: Verify the simplification:
- Maintains legal accuracy?
- Removes unnecessary jargon?
- Uses plain language?
- Preserves all key terms and conditions?
- Easy for non-lawyers to understand?

Step 3: Create final version balancing clarity and legal precision

Step 4: Provide side-by-side comparison showing what changed and why

Present all versions with explanations.

Task: Solve this complex problem: [problem]

Step 1: Solve the problem, showing your reasoning step-by-step

Step 2: Review your solution:
- Check each step for logical errors
- Verify calculations
- Consider alternative approaches
- Identify assumptions that might be wrong

Step 3: If errors found, solve again with corrections

Step 4: Provide final solution with confidence level

Present:
1. Initial solution with reasoning
2. Critical review
3. Corrected solution (if needed)
4. Confidence assessment

Task: Write a product description for [product]

Here are 3 examples of excellent product descriptions:
[Example 1]
[Example 2]
[Example 3]

Step 1: Write initial description

Step 2: Compare your description to the examples:
- What techniques do the examples use that yours doesn't?
- How is tone/style different?
- What makes the examples more compelling?

Step 3: Rewrite incorporating the best elements from examples

Present:
1. Initial description
2. Comparison analysis
3. Improved description

Task: [Your task]

Generate 3 different initial versions.

For each version:
1. Identify strengths
2. Identify weaknesses
3. Rate overall quality (1-10)

Select the best version.

Refine it 3 times, each time:
- Critiquing current version
- Identifying specific improvements
- Creating better version

Present:
- All 3 initial versions
- Selection reasoning
- All 3 refinement iterations
- Final polished version

Task: [Your task]

Generate initial response.

Quickly critique: What are the 3 biggest weaknesses?

Create improved version addressing those 3 issues.

Present:
1. Initial
2. Top 3 weaknesses
3. Improved

Task: [Creative task]

Generate initial creative concept.

Evaluate:
- Originality (derivative or fresh?)
- Clarity (easy to understand?)
- Emotional impact (does it resonate?)
- Memorability (will people remember it?)

Rate each 1-10.

Create improved version pushing scores higher.

Generate 2 alternative directions based on the critique.

Present:
1. Initial concept
2. Evaluation scores
3. Improved main concept
4. Two alternative directions

Step 2: Critique based on:
- Clarity (can a 12-year-old understand it?)
- Completeness (covers all key points?)
- Conciseness (no unnecessary words?)
- Actionability (reader knows what to do next?)

Present:
1. Initial version
2. Detailed critique
3. Improved version
4. Explanation of key improvements

Write a blog post about [topic] for [audience] with [goal].
Refine based on [specific criteria relevant to audience and goal].

Initial version:
- Reading level: Grade 14 (too complex)
- Word count: 450
- Key terms mentioned: 2

Refined version:
- Reading level: Grade 10 (accessible)
- Word count: 380 (more concise)
- Key terms mentioned: 7 (better SEO)