Zapier vs Power Automate vs Make: Which Automation Platform is Right for You?

You've decided to automate your workflows—smart move. But now you're facing the paradox of choice: Zapier, Power Automate, and Make (formerly Integromatic) all promise to connect your apps and eliminate manual work. Which one deserves your time and money?

After extensive testing across dozens of use cases, I'll break down where each platform excels, where they fall short, and which scenarios favor each tool. By the end, you'll know exactly which platform fits your needs.

The Quick Verdict

Choose Zapier if: You want the easiest learning curve and broadest app selection. Best for individuals and small teams automating common workflows.

Choose Power Automate if: You're heavily invested in Microsoft 365. Best for enterprises needing deep Office integration and governance controls.

Choose Make if: You need complex logic and visual workflow design. Best for power users who want flexibility and better pricing at scale.

Now let's dig into the details.

Platform Overview

Zapier

Founded in 2011, Zapier pioneered the no-code automation space. With 6,000+ app integrations, it remains the most connected platform.

Ideal user: Non-technical professionals who want quick wins without complexity.

Power Automate

Microsoft's automation platform, formerly called Flow, integrates deeply with Microsoft 365 and Azure. It's the default choice for Microsoft-centric organizations.

Ideal user: Microsoft 365 users who need seamless integration with Teams, SharePoint, and other Microsoft tools.

Make (formerly Integromatic)

The visual workflow builder known for handling complex scenarios with branching logic, data manipulation, and error handling.

Ideal user: Technical users and agencies who build sophisticated automations with many steps.

App Integrations Compared

The value of an automation platform depends largely on whether it connects to your tools.

Zapier: 6,000+ Apps

Strengths:

• Largest app library by far
• New apps added weekly
• Many "depth" integrations with multiple triggers and actions per app
• Excellent coverage of niche and industry-specific tools

Weaknesses:

• Some integrations are community-built with varying quality
• Premium apps require higher-tier plans

Power Automate: 500+ Connectors

Strengths:

• Deepest Microsoft 365 integration (unmatched by competitors)
• Premium connectors for enterprise systems (SAP, Oracle, Salesforce)
• Custom connectors for API-accessible services
• On-premises data gateway for legacy systems

Weaknesses:

• Smaller library than competitors
• Non-Microsoft apps sometimes have limited functionality
• Some connectors require premium licensing

Make: 1,500+ Apps

Strengths:

• Strong coverage of popular tools
• HTTP/Webhook module connects to any API
• Good balance of breadth and depth
• Integrations tend to expose full API capabilities

Weaknesses:

• Fewer niche app integrations than Zapier
• Some advanced features require technical knowledge

Winner: Zapier for breadth, Power Automate for Microsoft depth.

Ease of Use

How quickly can you build your first automation?

Zapier: Simplest Learning Curve

Zapier's interface is intentionally basic:

1. Pick a trigger app and event
2. Pick an action app and event
3. Map fields between them
4. Test and publish

The linear, step-by-step wizard means most users build their first Zap within 15 minutes. The tradeoff is less flexibility for complex scenarios.

Learning time: 15-30 minutes for basics

Power Automate: Moderate Complexity

Power Automate uses a flowchart-style builder:

• Drag-and-drop interface with branching
• More configuration options per step
• Dynamic content picker for field mapping
• Built-in templates for common scenarios

The learning curve is steeper, partly due to Microsoft-specific terminology (like "expressions" for formulas).

Learning time: 1-2 hours for basics

Make: Steepest but Most Powerful

Make's visual interface shows workflows as connected modules:

• Drag modules onto a canvas
• Draw connections between them
• Configure complex routing and filtering
• Handle errors with dedicated paths

The visual approach is powerful once learned but initially overwhelming. Most users need to invest real time understanding the paradigm.

Learning time: 2-4 hours for basics

Winner: Zapier for beginners, Make for visual learners who invest time.

Workflow Complexity

What can you actually build on each platform?

Zapier: Linear Simplicity

Can do:

• Multi-step workflows (up to 100 steps on higher plans)
• Conditional logic with Paths
• Filters to control when Zaps run
• Formatters for data transformation
• Delay and schedule steps

Struggles with:

• Loops and iterations (limited)
• Complex branching (only two paths per branch)
• Error handling (basic)
• Data aggregation across records

Power Automate: Enterprise Capable

Can do:

• Complex branching with Switch and Conditions
• Loops (Apply to Each, Do Until)
• Parallel branches for simultaneous processing
• Error handling with Try/Catch patterns
• Custom API calls with HTTP connector
• Desktop flows (RPA) for legacy systems
• Business process flows for human workflows

Struggles with:

• Visual clarity in complex flows
• Performance with very large data sets
• Non-Microsoft ecosystem integration depth

Make: Maximum Flexibility

Can do:

• Unlimited branching and routing
• Sophisticated iteration (Iterator, Aggregator modules)
• Robust error handling with dedicated routes
• Data stores for maintaining state
• Advanced text and data manipulation
• API calls with full control over requests
• Modular design with reusable scenarios

Struggles with:

• Simple workflows feel over-engineered
• Learning curve is real barrier
• Documentation assumes technical background

Winner: Make for complex scenarios, Power Automate for enterprise requirements.

Pricing Comparison

Automation costs add up. Here's how they compare:

Zapier Pricing (2025)

Each successful trigger counts as a task. Multi-step workflows count multiple tasks.

Power Automate Pricing (2025)

Premium connectors require paid plans. Microsoft's bundling makes costs complex to calculate.

Make Pricing (2025)

Each module execution counts as an operation. Complex workflows use more operations per run.

Real-World Cost Example

Scenario: Process 500 form submissions per month, each triggering a 5-step workflow.

• Zapier: 2,500 tasks → Professional plan at £39/month
• Power Automate: Included with Microsoft 365 or £12/user
• Make: 2,500 operations → Core plan at £7/month

Winner: Make for price-conscious users, Power Automate if you have Microsoft 365.

Microsoft 365 Integration

If you live in Microsoft's ecosystem, this section matters most.

Power Automate: Native Integration

Power Automate treats Microsoft apps as first-class citizens:

• Teams: Post messages, create channels, mention users, adaptive cards
• SharePoint: Full site, list, and document library automation
• Outlook: Email, calendar, contacts with all fields exposed
• Excel Online: Direct cell manipulation, table operations
• OneDrive: File operations with metadata support
• Dynamics 365: Full CRM automation
• Power Apps: Trigger flows from apps, return data

Features unavailable elsewhere:

• Trigger flows from Teams adaptive cards
• Automated document approval with e-signature
• Deep SharePoint metadata and permissions
• Business process flows in Dynamics

Zapier Microsoft Integration

Zapier covers the basics:

• Outlook email triggers and actions
• SharePoint list operations
• Teams messages
• OneDrive file management
• Excel spreadsheet updates

Missing compared to Power Automate:

• No Teams channel creation or membership management
• Limited SharePoint permissions control
• No Power Apps integration
• Fewer advanced Outlook features

Make Microsoft Integration

Make provides solid Microsoft coverage:

• Outlook and Teams basics
• SharePoint lists and files
• OneDrive operations
• Excel data manipulation

Similar limitations to Zapier for advanced Microsoft scenarios.

Winner: Power Automate (by a mile) for Microsoft-heavy workflows.

Reliability and Performance

Automation platforms must work consistently.

Execution Speed

• Zapier: Polls triggers every 1-15 minutes (depending on plan). Instant triggers via webhooks for supported apps.
• Power Automate: Polling every 1-15 minutes or instant for webhook triggers. Can be slow with complex expressions.
• Make: Polling configurable from 15 minutes to instant. Generally fast execution once triggered.

Uptime and Reliability

All three platforms report 99.9%+ uptime. In practice:

• Zapier: Occasional delays during peak times
• Power Automate: Rare outages, sometimes linked to broader Microsoft 365 issues
• Make: Consistently reliable with good error visibility

Error Handling

• Zapier: Basic error notifications, automatic retry, limited control
• Power Automate: Run-after settings, parallel branches for error handling, detailed run history
• Make: Comprehensive error handling with break, rollback, commit, and error routes

Winner: Make for error handling, Power Automate for enterprise reliability requirements.

Support and Community

When you're stuck, help matters.

Zapier

• Extensive knowledge base and video tutorials
• Active community forums
• Email support on all plans
• Priority support on higher plans
• Zapier University learning platform

Power Automate

• Microsoft Learn training (free)
• Large community (Power Platform community)
• Microsoft support with Microsoft 365
• Extensive documentation (sometimes hard to navigate)
• Strong partner ecosystem for implementation help

Make

• Comprehensive documentation
• Active community forum
• Academy learning platform
• Email support on all plans
• Template library for common scenarios

Winner: Tie—all have solid resources for different learning styles.

Best Use Cases by Platform

Choose Zapier For:

✅ Connecting marketing tools (CRM, email, forms) ✅ Small business workflow automation ✅ Social media automation ✅ Simple lead routing and notifications ✅ Connecting niche or industry-specific apps ✅ Quick wins without technical investment

Choose Power Automate For:

✅ Microsoft 365 document workflows ✅ SharePoint and Teams automation ✅ Enterprise approval processes ✅ Business process automation in Dynamics 365 ✅ Organizations with Microsoft licensing ✅ Desktop automation (RPA) needs ✅ Compliance and governance requirements

Choose Make For:

✅ Complex data transformations ✅ Multi-branch workflow logic ✅ API integration projects ✅ E-commerce automation ✅ Agencies managing client workflows ✅ Technical users wanting maximum control ✅ Budget-conscious high-volume automation

Migration Considerations

Already on one platform? Here's what switching involves:

Zapier → Make: Good path. Make handles most Zapier scenarios with more flexibility. Export isn't automatic; rebuild required.

Zapier → Power Automate: Only worthwhile for Microsoft ecosystem benefits. Less app coverage overall.

Power Automate → Zapier: Lose Microsoft depth. Gain app breadth. Consider for non-Microsoft workflows only.

Power Automate → Make: Possible but rare. Usually done for pricing or complexity reasons.

Make → Zapier: Simplification. May lose advanced features but gain easier maintenance.

My Recommendation Framework

Answer these questions to find your fit:

1. Are you heavily invested in Microsoft 365?

• Yes → Power Automate
• No → Continue to question 2

2. Do you need complex logic, loops, or data transformation?

• Yes → Make
• No → Continue to question 3

3. Do you need integrations with niche or specialized apps?

• Yes → Zapier
• No → Continue to question 4

4. Is budget your primary concern?

• Yes → Make
• No → Zapier

5. Are you a technical user who values flexibility?

• Yes → Make
• No → Zapier

Final Verdict

There's no universally "best" platform—only the best platform for your situation.

Zapier wins on simplicity and app coverage. It's the right choice for most non-technical users automating common business tools.

Power Automate wins for Microsoft shops. If your organization runs on Office 365, the deep integration justifies learning the platform's quirks.

Make wins on value and power. Technical users and agencies who need complex workflows get more capability per dollar.

The good news: all three platforms offer free tiers. Build the same workflow on each, and let your experience guide the decision. The time invested in testing will pay off in years of productive automation ahead.

---

Ready to get started? Check out our beginner tutorials for Zapier, Power Automate, and Make to build your first automation today.